Re: Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0 (Request for comments)

["Roderick A. Anderson" <..hidden..>]

Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
> > Just to note what we get from being close to the db and letting it do
> > our authentication for us:
>
> Use Catalyst. It lets you do what you want. It only steps in where you need 
> it.

+1

And the user community feels like the PostgreSQL and LedgerSMB do.

> Catalyst handles M, V, and C as pluggable parts.  You can even write your own 
> model layer, though most people want to use an ORM. Currently I think most 
> people use DBIx::Class, thhough I'd personally like to look into Fey and 
> Fey::ORM. There's more SQL flavor in there :-)


\\||/
Rod
--