[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: future of LedgerSMB

Jeff Kowalczyk wrote:
> --- Chris Travers wrote:
>> If we rewrite the entire application at once, I am quite afraid it
>> will never be completed simply because it is such a big task.
> I agree with this, a rewrite with redesign [1] would take way too long for any
> new or SL user to remain interested in SMB.

Bah! I disagree completely. As long as we maintain the stable branch it
would likely not effect us at all.

The fact that people were even willing to run SL speaks to that.

The rest I don't have much of a comment on ;)

Joshua D. Drake


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/