[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rehash: LedgerSMB Wiki

We talked about that.  While we are interested in Trak, we have other
priorities that are in the works that are higher on the list.  I would
not expect it in the near future but perhaps sometime down the road.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 1/6/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <..hidden..> wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> We of course appreciate the offer but we decided on the direction we are
> taking because we want an all in one solution that we don't have to
> worry about.
> The CMS gives us many things beyond the "wiki" idea.

Separate from the end-user documentation efforts, may I ask if with the new
hosting resources, source code development can use Trac in the near future?

Trac is certainly not competitive as a Wiki for major end-user documentation
projects. But for developers, as discussed here previously, (IMO) Trac would be
a huge boost to creating an active LedgerSMB developer-tester community.
Sourceforge's issue tracker is almost a disincentive to closely evaluate the
status of LedgerSMB.

Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list