Re: Rehash: LedgerSMB Wiki

["Chris Travers" <..hidden..>]

We talked about that.  While we are interested in Trak, we have other
priorities that are in the works that are higher on the list.  I would
not expect it in the near future but perhaps sometime down the road.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

On 1/6/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <..hidden..> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We of course appreciate the offer but we decided on the direction we are
> > taking because we want an all in one solution that we don't have to
> > worry about.
> >
> > The CMS gives us many things beyond the "wiki" idea.
>
> Separate from the end-user documentation efforts, may I ask if with the new
> hosting resources, source code development can use Trac in the near future?
>
> Trac is certainly not competitive as a Wiki for major end-user documentation
> projects. But for developers, as discussed here previously, (IMO) Trac would be
> a huge boost to creating an active LedgerSMB developer-tester community.
> Sourceforge's issue tracker is almost a disincentive to closely evaluate the
> status of LedgerSMB.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel