[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Stance on advertising on the list
- Subject: Re: RFC: Stance on advertising on the list
- From: David <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:55:05 +1000
I've paid Chris for small jobs in the past and was happy to do so. I
would definitely pay for help again in the future if I needed it.
Having said that, I think it would be tricky having complicated
guidelines for advertising. If I were the advertising god I would do it
* List of providers on a page on the website, with relevant experience
* Offer of services in emails limited to signatures only - NOT in the
body of an answer.
When I've needed paid software help, I based my choice on the value of
mailing list posts or commits to the software itself. They turn out to
be very reliable indicators.
I don't think any of us would want an excellent list like this to fill
up with trolling for work.
On 21/09/11 04:44, Chris Travers wrote:
I wanted to send out an email here with suggested guidelines for
mentioning paid services on this list. In general I personally think
there is a place for this here, but I don't think any of us want every
request for help to be answered only with offers for paid help. So I
figured I would offer some thoughts and guidelines for comment and see
what people think.
One of the important features of an open source community is the
ability of people to find service providers that can meet their needs
so that they don't have to do everything themselves. One aspect of
helping users out may be to suggest paid services from time to time.
The main goal of these guidelines is to ensure we keep things
Here are a few proposed Do's and Dont's.....
* Feel free to offer paid services to those who need it, integrated
into other helpful tips. Things like "Here are some ways you can get
going.... On the other hand, if you'd like paid hosting, we can set
it up, and host it for you" is a good thing. It gives a user a few
options and the user can then decide what to do.
* Participate in the community in a wide variety of ways. Users are
generally happier to hire people with track records in the community
than those who simply use the community to only advertise their
* If you want to advertise your paid services in an email signature,
by all means go for it.
* Reply to every request for help with an offer to help for a fee.
* Limit your participation in the community to offering paid help.
* Be uncivil, disrespectful to the rest of the community, etc.
One aspect of keeping a lot of this on the list is that it helps users
out by ensuring some transparency and providing a wide range of
options for going forward.
What do people think? Any additional guidelines? Do people like
these or do people think these are the wrong direction?
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
Ledger-smb-users mailing list