Re: 1.3 development proposal

["Chris Travers" <..hidden..>]

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
> In 1.3, we have already added an ability to apply an account number
> filter to the transactions.  Is there any reason why people would
> still want the old chart of accounts transaction list?  Or could we
> send those requests to the gl transactions report instead?

If anyone is wondering "why?" there are two reasons for proposing this:

1)  It means fewer points of maintenance on the code we inherited and
2)  There is a major performance issue with the report we would be
deprecating when used against large databases.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers