[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anyone tried 1.2.12?
- Subject: Re: Anyone tried 1.2.12?
- From: ..hidden..
- Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:47:27 +0200 (SAST)
Hi there,
Thanks for the response. I have untared 1.2.12, backuped the original
directory and then copied over the result. I copied ledgersmb.conf from
the previous version 1.2.10.
I can't long it. It appears that the file should now be called
ledger-smb.conf and it refers to the user directory for user info. As far
as I know this was replaced a while ago by a central database. The result
is that I can't log in.
Any ideas or is to be expected and I just missed the announcement?
regards
> 2008. 02. 9, szombat keltezéssel 23.23-kor ..hidden.. ezt
> Ãrta:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Anyone tried 1.2.12. Is it worth the pain of upgrading?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>
>
> I upgraded from 1.2.9 without problem (test env).
> As far as I know, the database remains the same, only the logic changes
> when a minor change happened.
> That means, in the 1.2.x the database is the same.
>
> Cheers,
> István
>
>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>
> Anyway, is this line a joke??????
> As I can see, virus writers got a new toy :)
>
> --
> BSA. Mert megérdemlitek.
> Open Source. Mert megérdemlem.
> --
> BSA. They value it.
> Open Source. The value. It.
> --
> http://www.osbusiness.hu
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ledger-smb-users mailing list
> ..hidden..
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
>