[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change

Subject: Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
From: David Tangye <..hidden..>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 12:26:26 +1000

On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 18:57 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:
> >  (4) It makes it appear SQL Ledger is a one man band development.
> 
> It is.
> 
> We actually have 5 people who regularly commit large amounts of code
> on a regular bases (Joshua Drake, me, Chris Murtagh, Seneca
> Cunningham, and Jason Rodrigues) and a larger number who send us
> patches.
> 
Plus a score or more of people whose regular input as user requirements
and system design are taken SERIOUSLY and debated intelligently and
which become immediate fixes and/or significant factors in the direction
the software is going.

References:
- Article submitted to Slashdot re SQL-Ledger license change
  - From: Ashley J Gittins
- Re: Article submitted to Slashdot re SQL-Ledger license change
  - From: Ashley J Gittins
- Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
  - From: Peter Houppermans
- Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
  - From: Chris Travers

Prev by Date: Re: wrong total
Next by Date: Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
Previous by thread: Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
Next by thread: Re: Slashdot article SQL-Ledger license change
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread