Re: any objection to 1.5 depending on Pg 9.2 and above?

[Michael Richardson <..hidden..>]

Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
    > I have a pull request that significantly tightens up our stored
    > procedure logic but depends on features that were first introduced in
    > 9.2. This would significantly improve our ability to say for sure that
    > our stored procedures are valid for the versions we release (I found a
    > number of issues in doing this).

    > If we require 9.2 and higher we also get to assume we have json in the
    > db as well which would be useful in addons.

    > Are there any objections to dropping Pg 9.1 support for 1.5?

Please.
Postgresql.org produces new versions that run on even very ancient OS
platforms, so an upgrade isn't that big a deal.


--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     ..hidden..  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel