[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposed feature request (indefinite version): LaTeX document classes
- Subject: Re: Proposed feature request (indefinite version): LaTeX document classes
- From: Michael Richardson <..hidden..>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 09:18:52 -0500
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <..hidden..> writes:
Chris> I am wondering what folks think about moving from LaTeX
Chris> templates per se to LaTeX document classes and packages, with
Chris> a lot less micromanagement of layout in the template itself.
Chris> The idea is that we could provide a good LaTeX development
Chris> environment rather than some sample documents. The LaTeX
Chris> document classes might even be things that could be pushed
Chris> into TeXLive, thus getting more exposure and wider use.
please tell me more about what this means.
Does this mean that I could test templates outside of LedgerSMB?
Chris> If other projects use our work this increases the likelihood
Chris> that we can expand our exposure to the market generally, and
Chris> may get help in this area from others as well.
that's seems like a good thing.
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.