Re: Proposals for 1.4 framework changes

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> As I am going over it, it seems our reasons for avoiding Moose have
> become less of an issue and now some of our dependencies depend on
> Moose.  Consequently I think I am going to recommend we start using it
> for new code starting with 1.4.  The original reasons involved lack of
> support with mature versions on many distributions, and the fact that
> it has a lot of dependencies.  However, we now have dependencies that
> depend on Moose, so I don't see a reason not to use it.
>
Just to be clear, the framework would be backwards-compatible and this
would only affect new code going forwards.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers