Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 released, notes about LedgerSMB compatibility

[Chris Travers <..hidden..>]

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Josh Berkus <..hidden..> wrote:
> On 9/23/10 9:09 AM, Chris Travers wrote:
>> However, it is also offers some
>> non-backwards-compatible changes to the way PL/PGSQL operates.  My
>> initial thinking is that 1.2 should run OK on it but the development
>> branch may not without further modification.  This is because 1.3
>> relies on affected areas much more than 1.2.
>
> Hmmm?  You've been overloading column names as variables?
>

Also even with 1,2, I have noticed a few things that need to be
documented (and possibly correcting) already regarding installing
LedgerSMB on it.  For example, it now looks like plgsql comes
standard, and I am not 100% sure if this will break the db setup
scripts.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers