[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed change for 1.4



I second Erik's suggestion.
The voiding process seems incomplete to me if it requires me posting a dummy payment in order to have it marked as closed

Andrew

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Erik Huelsmann <..hidden..> wrote:
Replying to myself: I think that if we can create reports which exclude reversed and reversal transactions, that serves both the accounting audit trail purpose and the optical "I've deleted the transaction" purpose for good overview.

Bye,

Erik.


On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Erik Huelsmann <..hidden..> wrote:

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
Hi;

I would like to propose that we stop allowing transactions to be
reposted or deleted in 1.4, and instead always require transaction
reversal.

Is there any objection to this?


Here's my strong support for the proposal.


Bye,

Erik.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2

_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users