[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for infrastructure (feedback requested)



Hi Chris,

Looks like a great service. It definitely sounds like we can use this for the 1.3 and 1.4 branches to prevent breakage.

To those who don't know about the scope of our testing, you told me that these are the types of tests that we have currently in place:

 - number formatting
 - number parsing 
 - template handling 
 - basic form and request api
 - api tests that run against the db (but never commit)
 - pod 
 - pod coverage

Would be good to assure that our release branches remain stable and don't fail tests when we commit/merge changes. I think this would be a good next step in our QA.


Regards,


Erik.




On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Chris Travers <..hidden..> wrote:
Hi;

For one of my consulting clients, I have been running travis-CI against some Perl projects.  It's a nice service which gives us test cases run on every commit.

I am considering setting it up for our Github repositories (the PGObject modules as well). 

Does anyone have any feedback?  Are there any problem that anyone wants to report before I start this process?

--
Best Wishes,
Chris Travers

Efficito:  Hosted Accounting and ERP.  Robust and Flexible.  No vendor lock-in.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel




--
Bye,

Erik.

http://efficito.com -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slashdot TV.  
Video for Nerds.  Stuff that matters.
http://tv.slashdot.org/
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel