Re: Proposal for 1.5: Move LedgerSMB to Dancer

[Louis <..hidden..>]

On Sun, 10 Aug 2014, Chris Travers wrote:

> Hi all; There has been some discussion in the past I have had with folks 
> about moving LedgerSMB to Catalyst.  The concern I have is that as 
> Catalyst is a fairly large framework it isn't clear how much we'd be 
> using very light aspects of the framework and how much dependency 
> overhead we'd have.

I use Catalyst for some things, and it seems to me to be quite heavy. 
Dancer/Dancer2 I am not familiar with, but as far as LedgerSMB is 
concerned I'll always be more of a user than a developer. I would like to 
see LedgerSMB move into a framework. I see that as part of the overall 
attitude that LedgerSMB is part of a larger ecosystem rather than one 
man's labor.


FWIW,

Louis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-devel mailing list
..hidden..
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-devel