>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Travers <..hidden..> writes:
Chris> 2) Support a make install-based approach. Right now make
Chris> install creates significant supportability issues. However,
Chris> if we allow one to make install, it could be downloaded into
>> Ah, you thought perhaps I wanted to insist on "make install".
>> Just the opposite... I want to *support*, but as a developer, I
>> don't want it at all.
>>
Chris> What's the problem with make install?
1) you have to install somewhere....
2) ^X^S, shift-reload is way faster.
3) ^X^S, "make check" is way cooler.
So, I *want* make install for packaging and target system use, but I
would like to maintain the run-in-current-directory system. I think we
can have both.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] ..hidden.. http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
Attachment:
pgpZb5IM9HdFl.pgp
Description: PGP signature