Re: File attachment API proposal v2

[Luke <..hidden..>]

On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote:

> Hi Luke and Erik;
>
> First, yes, there were some typos.  This was intended to be a
> pseudocode example not a rigid spec.

Okay, I figured.  However, I'm not an expert or even a power user when it 
comes to PostGreSQL, so I could have just as easily been wrong.
I thought it better to point them out in case I was missing something.

> BTW, I am going to suggest the following number assignments to start:

I guess zero isn't an option?  It seems the appropriate number for 
unattached files if it's available.

> 1)  Transactions
> 2)  Orders
> 3)  Reconciliation
> 4)  Entity
> 5)  Entity Credit Account (Customer/Vendor)
> 6)  Employee
> 7)  Parts
> 8)  Unattached Imports
> 9)  Standard Documents

Payments and Receipts are covered by transactions?

Just as a "for future need", may I suggest some space between these 
numbers, in case grouping of similar elements becomes desirable later, but 
is unforeseen now?  A couple "reserved" numbers on either side of those 
above 3.
Just a thought.

Luke